ondebanks wrote:
precertvideo wrote:
I think I've found an image of the CCD/board, (I can't remember where though...)

Notice how all the film-advance sprockets and takeup spool are still in situ in the body! That's how people always pictured how a 35mm "digital back" would look. Literally, an electronic something which would clip-on in place of the film pressure-plate and back door; you would be able to revert to film at any time. How things have turned out differently.
Ray
I'm reminded of "silicon film", which was a parallel idea - the concept was that the electronics would fit into a case the size of a film cartridge, which would go into the take-up spool, with the sensor embedded in a projection as flat as film:
http://cultureandcommunication.org/dead ... licon_FilmLots of controversy as to whether it existed or not - and most the cameras it worked with had already been turned into digital SLRs, including the F3 above. It always seemed like the kind of thing that would only make sense if it was really cheap, or if digital SLRs remained at five-figure Kodak DCS price levels, neither of which seemed likely in 2001. Still, I always wondered if Kodak thought of marketing DCS 420, 460, EOS DCS base units separately, to people who already had a Nikon F90 or an EOS 1.
Also, David Prowse' autobiography is called "Straight from the Force's Mouth", which has nothing to do with digital cameras but is unexpectedly witty.