Webmaster wrote:
spreefurt wrote:
And the SCS 2000 is older than the 720X.
I've never studied any of these cameras, so I don't know anything about the physical differences. Perhaps the SCS 2000 is simply an earlier model made for "government use" (e.g. military, law enforcement, etc.) that was later made public, as suggested by Stan Disbrow in the above thread: "It's not unusual for a company to produce low-volume 'specials' for a large customer and then leverage that development into a mainstream product." Sounds plausible.
According to the complete
Kodak DSLR list the DCS 720X was relased a year after the SCS 2000. I'm not sure how accurate the dates in this list are, but it should be a good indication. According to this contemporary dpreview article, the 720X was announced on June 4, 2001:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0106/01060 ... cs720x.aspYes, and this is the reason, why the SCS 2000 should not be called a mutation of the 720X, as in the linked statement about the "military version of the dcs 720x with better weather sealing". It cannot be a "version" of the 720X coming later and it has no better sealing. The most important parts on the top of the camera are from Nikon, and Kodak would not be able to change the sealing.
Stan Disbrow wrote:
Yep, that's what it looks like to me as well. They updated the 620x to fufill this contract model and then used that work to later update the 620x into the 720x.
Yes, this seems to be true. Perhaps Kodak didn't want to update the 620X because of the expected low numbers. And it seems they would have been right. Only about 1600 720X were built. The SCS 2000 should be much rarer. But I cannot derive the total number from the serial number of my SCS 2000.
